Dickens A Christmas Carol as a Victorian Novella

Charles Dickens is one of the famous Victorian writers contemporary to Lord Alfred Tennyson (famous work In Memoriam) who is a Victorian poet.A Christmas Carol (1843) , written by Charles Dickens is a Victorian novella that shows Dickens use of mastery over supernatural forces and realism. Dickens is one of the many writers who have also employed the blend of imagination and realism in his art work. The novella depicts the Victorian attitude towards Christmas and the happiness associated with the holiday season. Dickens embarked on morality that one can enjoy and fulfil their joy without requiring a good amount of money for a Christmas celebration. 

The novella is a Victorian literature in its essence because it depicts the materialistic world of the Victorian society. The society has become capitalistic and the impact of growing urbanization promoted the growth of capitalism in the society. Scrooge is a wealthy man who only values money over family relationships and joyful life. He is a typical Victorian man who enjoys capital power and it is seen that he even decline the Christmas invitations from his nephew. He also decline and refuse to help two gentleman who are collecting some money for the poor children. This reflects that Scrooge is a materialistic man who believes in the capital power and rejects the happiness and emotions associated with the celebration. His refusal to celebrate with others also shows the individual nature and lifestyle of Victorian society.                   

The novella centres around the empty life of Scrooge who has filled his soul with money. The mastery of supernatural forces who came to visit Scrooge taught him a lesson. The first ghost, the Past Christmases shows his how Scrooge had a very sad and lonely childhood. He even lost his lover whom he loved as he chased after his fortune for money. This shows that Scrooge life is empty and void of happiness and joy but of money and capitalism. This reflects the Victorian society who are individual and devoid of human contact and relationships.  

However , the appearance of second ghost , the Ghost of Christmas Now gives the other side of the Victorian society. The ghost showed him the empty heart of his life and the poor ignorant society of Victorian era. The Ghost showed him that his nephew Fred and Bob, his employee are enjoying their Christmas celebration without much money. They are celebrating and enjoying their time with their family even with less money representing the happiness that is generated out of human relationships rather than money. 

Furthermore , the appearance of third Ghost of Future Christmas made Scrooge to realise his mistake. The ghost showed him the future where he has died and the Cratchit family lost their son Tiny Tim which made him sad and to stop the scene. He finally realizes his mistake and decides to help the poor children and enjoy Christmas with his nephew. 

The Victorian literature also shows the dark reality of poor section of society. Due to the impact of Reform Bills , the writers started to display the poorer sections of society who are ignored. The life of Bob ,an employee who is a poor person has an ailing son yet enjoys the Christmas. The representation of poor Children and people collecting money for the poor pauper also shows the dark reality of Victorian age where class consciousness is a big threat to the society. Dickens is satirizing the ignorance of poor children and when Scrooge refused to help the two gentleman , it clearly reflects the typical attitude of Victorian society who refuse to help the poor paupers.

The another traits of Victorian literature is the stress on morality. Morality is an important element of every Victorian writings. Dickens novella also shows the aspect of morality where the ghost teaches him an important lesson on loosening up the materialistic world and enjoy life by creating bonds and relationships. It also teaches every Victorians that one does not need capital or money to enjoy life or to celebrate happy occasions such as Christmas as family and friendships is important than money. The value of friendships and relationships surpasses the Money after all. 

Summary of Gordon Cook and Alan East We’re Not Afraid to Die… If We Can All Be Together

The story opens with the introduction to the narrator , a thirty seven year old business man and his family members. Mary is the wife of a narrator and they have two children namely son Jonathan, a six year old boy and a daughter Suzanne , a seven year old girl. The narrator and his family members starts their journey in July 1976 from Plymouth England to Australia in order to imitate the voyage made by Captain James Cook 200 years before. They have been practicing in British waters for the past 16 years before going on a voyage improving their sea skills. 

The name of the boat is Wavewalker and it is professionally built meaning that the boat is constructed and build for the sea voyages where they have been testing the boat for months in the sea storms and roughest weather they could possibly find. The first plan they made three years earlier was to go from Plymouth England to West Coast of Africa to Capetown covering a distance of 1,05,000 Km that passes smoothly. They took two crewmen named American Larry Vigil and Swiss Herb Seigler who seems to have a good sea experiences and the narrator decides to take them to help them tackle the obstructions they may face during their voyage. 

As they head towards the east , they encountered strong winds. The winds do not worry the narrator but the size of the waves that reaches as almost as 15m high which is also the height of the boat’s main mast. On December 25 , they celebrated the Christmas and January 1 saw no improvement in the weather but the weather changed for the worse meaning that the weather has become violent than they experienced after leaving Capetown. 

January 2 saw the worst of weather where the waves have become gigantic. It is big and the narrator and other crew members started to prepare to tackle the approaching huge waves. The first warning sign of an upcoming doom came at about 6 pm where the wind dropped and the sky grew dark. It started to rain with a thunder along with the huge waves making a threatening breaking crest. As the wave approaches the boat, the boat face upwards and the sudden explosion shook the deck and the water running over the deck smash the narrator’s head and he fly overboard into the waves. He accepts his own death but he regains back his consciousness. 

As the narrator lies on the surface of the waves , he saw the ship almost horizontal but the wave hurl the ship upright to a vertical position and he was able to use that force to make an entry into the boom. The narrator has a cracked ribs and a broken teeth with some blood on his mouth. He finds the wheel and started to govern the boat. Mary appeared screaming and the narrator demanded his wife to control the wheel. 

Larry and Herb were pumping the water out from the boat. There are so many floating debris on the water and the narrator goes to check on his children. He finds that his children are saved but Suzanne has got a big bump above her eyes. The narrator shows less concern over her big bump and he goes to repair the starboard side that is broken due to the waves. The main engine is located near that starboard hull and the narrator repairs the side of the starboard to prevent the water from flowing inside using waterproof canvas and many important resources such as firestay sail, small rescue boats or dinghies , the jib were thrown off into the water. 

The high amount of debris floating around the water led to the blockage of the pumps and it gets short circuited. As the narrator remembers that there are still two spare hand pumps in the chartroom , he connects this two hand pumps to an out pipe that starts to pump the water out from the ship. They are not receiving any Mayday calls and help from nearby stations as they are far away from those stations and unsurprising to the narrator. 

Sue’s injury over her head is alarmingly threatening because it is swollen and she do not tell the narrator because she do not want to worry him. It’s morning January 3 and the family members and two crewmen are able to take rest for two hours as the pumps are working pushing the water out from the boat. The narrator finds that their resources are limited because of the damages done to the subsidiary resources. He knows that he cannot make it to Australia and decides to land on the nearby island of IIe  Amsterdam, a French scientific base. 

As on January 4, after 36 hours of driving the water out from the boat, the narrator uses the jib to push the boat. The ropes that tie to the main mast and over the damaged hull would simply tear it apart if they uses main mast to push the boat as the pressure of the wind would pull the rope that would eventually pull the hull and tear it apart. So they used the jib instead. 

As they set sail using the jib, at 4pm the weather started to change again and continues to deteriorate till January 5. The narrator decides to comfort his children but he stays resilient towards the problems. Jon tells that he is not afraid of dying of they are all together. Having heard such words of wisdom , the narrator becomes motivated to protect the damaged starboard hull by lifting the boat with the help of an anchor from the approaching waves. On January 6, they are able to ride out of the storm and the narrator goes inside the chartroom to make calculations and readings on the position of their ship and the island of Amsterdam. He believed that they are somewhere in 1,50,000Km in the ocean searching for the 65km wide long Island of Amsterdam. 

Sue  approaches the narrator and drew the caricature of his father and mother and writes “Here are some funny people” that made the narrator laugh. She does so because she wants to give a sense of relief and humour amidst the uncertainty. The narrator starts to read the calculations again and as he was using the spare compass , it does not give a precise measurements of their location due to magnetic variations. The narrator asked Larry to steer the wheel to 185degrees and said that they would reached the island at 5pm. He goes inside to the bunk and he finds that his calculations is mistaken. It is already 6 pm and they haven’t  reached the island yet. Jonathan and Suzanne comes to the bunk and Jonathan hugs his father. The narrator is confused and is later revealed by Sue that they have found the island. The narrator is surprised and goes to the deck to see the island of Amsterdam. It has so many volcanic rocks with little vegetation having 28 inhabitants. 

They landed the next morning in the island of Amsterdam and the inhabitants cheer them and help them offshore. The narrator reflects back on the moments from the past where he thinks of Larry and Herb who were optimistic and happy even during the toughest times. He recalls his own wife Mary who controlled the wheel while he went to repair the main part of the boat’s hull till the finding of the hand pumps. He thinks of his own daughter who had a big bump on her head that took six minor operations to remove the blood clot between the skin and skull and also his son who is not afraid of dying. 

Dom Moraes My Son’s Father Summary (A Piece of Childhood)

A Piece of Childhood

Chapter -1 The novel opens with an epigraph a small extract from his own poem “A Letter” giving a talk about his mother and atmosphere of his home.  The novel begins with the memory of his absent father that he misses having it as his “first real memory”. It was summer before his father went to a war and he saw young English officers going their way to the Burma where even the poet Alun Lewis had died there. He started describing his house location which is romanticized and behind their flat was the Arabian sea. Moraes mother was a pious woman but his father was not religious as his mother explained to him because his father received his education in England. 

The narrator goes on to talk about his childhood days before his father went to war. His father would read newspapers and he would run to his mother first when he is in stress and was shy towards his father. He believes his mother “smelt of flowers” and he would “buried my head between her small breasts and was happy”. He narrates the daily routine of the family members like dinner , lunch and walk with his nanny at the part and young English officers having a beer before his father went to war. The narrator receives a letter from his father from Burma and his father sketches a picture of him in the margin , one of himself , standing in a jungle slashed at by the slanting rain. The narrator asked his mother about his father but his mother replied back with “in a cloudy way “which was becoming common in her personality. 

While the narrator and his many were walking down the pavement during the monsoon , there was a sudden explosion and they talk about the end of the world. Moraes mother came to take them back home. Moraes mother said that there were some oil tanker that has burst in the harbour. Dom asked if such explosions also happens in the war and her mother started to cry. The narrator then goes on to explain his parents love story and marriage where they both met when her mother was sixteen and father twenty one. His father went to England and for eight years was at Oxford’s and Lincoln’s  Inn. They wrote each other and he came back as a qualified barrister but he was a literary person who got the post of Literary Editor in the Times of India. They both got married and Moraes explains that his mother’s paternal especially her mother was the first Indian woman doctor and her name is endowed still in Bombay. Her father was an engineer but Moraes states that Hindu caste system has divided their Catholic communities too. Their parents got married in 1937 and he was born in 19July 1938. 

The narrator shows the Indian growing nationalism where his father attended parties and both his parents smoked and drunk. They also supported Gandhi and Nehru and their flat was filled with young nationalists who had either emerged from prison Or hiding from police. 

Moraes mother was a doctor, a pathologist and Moraes growing Oedipus complex is seen as he watches his mom work at the hospital nurturing the small foetuses and she was even send to look after Gandhi who went on a strike in 1944 at Juhu. The narrator talks about his visit to the camp at Juhu and his experiences meeting Mrs. Sarojini Naidu who handed him an orange. He also talks about Mahatma Gandhi and compared Mrs. Naidu to Mary Magdalene. Gandhi laughed and talked to him in English but he and his family only spoke English as his Catholic communities living in India had only spoken English for two generations. He only knew Hindi which was the pidgin that he used to speak with the helpers and servants at home. Gandhi asked Naidu whom she was and Naidu said Beryls. Gandhi tells that all the children of India should learn how to speak Hindi. He offered Gandhi the orange that Naidu gave it to him but Gandhi refuses and told him to take care of his mother till his father returns from Burma. 

After coming back from Juhu , Moraes mother would come to him at night and sat next to him talking about her childhood days and spend some time with him. She would cry at one of the songs being played by her and she even slapped Moraes when he asked the reason for weeping. He did not understand but his father returns home. It became a normal day for the family and his mother was hysterically happy. His father would come to his room and read him stories as there are parties in his flat and his father would spend time with him in his bedroom. 

After some days of his father’s  return , Moraes’s mother jewellery was stolen from the dressing table and the investigation by police found out that Hamal, who was a small country boy and a new employee was accused as the jewellery was found under his pillow. Hamal was later asked to leave at once by Moraes father who was enraged with anger and later it was found out that Ram , one of the servants and a bearer had actually stolen the jewellery because he had an affair with Moraes nanny and she got pregnant. Later , Ram brought back the jewellery and left but Moraes was angry and felt disappointed at how he treated Hamal who was innocent. 

As time goes by , the narrator started to spend time with his father going to Royal Asiatic Library and developing his taste for literary writing borrowing the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs , Jeffrey Farnol and Conan Doyle. Moraes mother seems to look different and she had become pale and unfriendly spending her time saying the rosary and her appearance has changed. Her mother tells him a story about the party they had been and were introduced to an American woman on their visit to Bombay. She told Moraes that his father had known her for years and She had a proof of it. He pretended that he met her only once on that party and he even visited her while he pretended to be in Burma. 

Moraes was completely shocked and he ceased to trust his own mother. He and his mother decides to go to Take Hotel that Moraes has never been too to meet the American woman his father has had been visiting. The woman , in her forties opened the hotel door and Moraes’s mother asked if she could speak with her regarding her own husband. They went to verandah to talk and he stood near the carpet. She returned crying from the verandah and left the hotel to home. Moraes went to his father’s  study room and read Batman. Moraes talks about his natural vivid imagination the moment he reads any book and the way he can add new into this plots and stories. His father became aware of Moraes’s  mother mental health as well as worried about Moraes’s mental health too.

Moraes was sent to Catholic Prep.School called Campion School and he was eight years old. He was unpopular and he was driven by the chauffeur every morning and driven back every evening. Moraes’s  Oedipus complex shifted to another woman teacher in the school including Miss James , a young Scottswoman whom with his imagination would rescue her from fire , flood and murderer and would get kisses in return as a reward. One day they went for a shopping and he was accompanied by a family friend Ashok whom he found quite annoying since he knew everyone in the school and Moraes was later introduced to others by him. 

Being at school , he didn’t see much of his mother and she had completely gone ravaged and dishevelled “with the indefinable terrifying look of madness”. She would lock herself in the room for four hours and the doctors began to appear in the flat. Moraes’s  father asked him if he would like to go to Ceylon as his father has been made the editor of The Times of Ceylon and they would have to live in Colombo. When Moraes’s  father went to tell his mother about it , she started to throw things here and there and even broke the tall plaster Christ on the wall and she even pushed her husband to the wall. She was about to break the phone as well and Moraes believed that this was the end of one part of his life.

Chapter 2-The author describes his journey from Bombay to Ceylon by train, a journey that was marked by a strange and unfamiliar environment. He was accompanied by a bearer, Vincent, and a driver, Kutthalingam, who were hired to accompany him. The train journey was filled with noise, smell, and trains, and the author felt a sense of departure. The train journey was a long and arduous one, with the author’s parents and stewards discussing the train’s conditions. The author’s father has two bearer namely Vincent who was the bearer, and Kutthalingam, the driver.The train journey was a long and arduous one, with the author experiencing the harsh realities of the journey. Vincent was always there to provide meals, water, and beer for the passengers. The driver was less decorous and sat comfortably in a heap of bedding.

The narrator’s journey to Colombo ends with his mother crying and her head looking like someone else’s. They stay in an expensive hotel by the sea while his father searches for a house. The mother is gay and witty, but her tears and uninterested behavior persist. The family finds a house called ‘Salcombe’ in a fashionable part of town, but the mother remains uninterested. Doctors recommend returning her to India, but the narrator refuses. The narrator spends time with his father and Kutthalingam, who takes him for drives around Colombo. Kutthalingam is a kindly man with seven children in India and is proud of his knowledge of Colombo. He takes the narrator to parks, zoos, and big shops. He even drives the narrator to Negombo, a beach outside Colombo, where he enjoys the best crabs he has ever eaten.

Kutthalingam was puzzled by his mother’s refusal to take some air, which he believed was bad for her health. One day, he asked her to come with him on an excursion to Mount Lavinia, a nearby beach. Kutthalingam pointed out beautiful spots and the mother wept, but she refused to pay for them. When they returned to Colombo, Kutthalingam pulled her out of the car, and she screamed. Kutthalingam then took her back to Mount Lavinia, where they discovered beautiful fish in the water. The fish died, and the mother became violent and feared for her safety. The father tried to take the child to his office to keep her out of her way, but the mother refused. The father planned to take the child with him, but the mother started watching until the father left. Kutthalingam eventually parked the car and the child joined them.

The narrator’s father was embarrassed by his constant presence in his office, reading and interacting with his staff and proprietors. He loved his job and enjoyed lunchtime in a large hotel. His mother became possessive and threatened to kidnap him if he went out with him. The narrator’s father tried to take him to his office to keep him out of her mother’s way, but her mother refused. The narrator’s mother became angry and threw objects, which the narrator refused to open. The narrator’s mother eventually locked herself in her room, and the narrator heard his father’s voice. He reluctantly complied, and the narrator and his father went to the office. As they entered the office, the mother rushed after them, demanding help. The doctor, along with two white women, pleaded with the narrator to help. The father’s face turned grey, and he instructed Kutthalingam to drive to the office.

The author’s mother is in Bombay, where she is receiving electric shock treatment. His father, Kutthalingam, and Vincent, a friend of Kutthalingam, entertain him and his dog Kumar, who is a champion in the dog show. The boy’s mother refuses to receive treatment, and the boy is left to spend the night with his family in Negombo.

The boy is terrified of his mother and resents her for stopping his evening out. The doctors lead him to the dog show, where he learns obedience from Vincent. The boy is acquitted of winning the novice exhibitor class, but is later praised for his obedience. Kutthalingam, who is acquitted of making Kumar sit, is praised for his bravery. The boy is praised for his bravery and wins the prize for the best novice and maiden exhibit.

The narrator, a young boy living in Ceylon, reads a variety of books, including children’s books and adult novels. He also writes a biography and a weekly magazine about household affairs. His father does not approve of his activities, but gives him a fishing rod to fish in the rock pools. The narrator discovers a racecourse near the house and a stream with tiny fish and weeds. He captures a mud turtle and brings it home, but Kutthalingam, the narrator’s father, is unhappy with it.

The narrator learns about Ceylon’s history and the ruins, which he discovers are populated by elephants, leopards, antelope, wild boar, buffalo, and monkeys. He is determined to be the first to see the legendary man-monkey, the Nittaewo, and is determined to be the first to see it. The house is shut up, and Kumar lodges with the same family.

The author and his father drove around the coast of Ceylon, visiting old Portuguese forts and other attractions. They then drove through the jungle, encountering various animals and encountering a leopard. They paddled out into the bay, where they heard the Nittaewo singing. The naturalist, a tall, white-haired Sinhalese, introduced them to the Nittaewo. The author’s father, a fat greying woman passed away after being struck by a bullock cart. The author and his father shared laughter about the incident.

After Batticaloa, they drove into the true jungle where they saw various animals. The early morning was the best time to see the larger animals, such as a leopard and a brown beast. Later in the day, the jungle became motionless and ashen, with animals sleeping except for the monkeys. They reached the abandoned kingdoms of Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa, the capitals of the first Sinhalese kings. The ruins of these ruins were not as well-cared for as they are now, but the sight of the fallen monuments made the author aware of history.

The author describes his experience with the Veddahs, the original inhabitants of Ceylon, who were introduced to them by a government man. The Veddahs offered the author birds’ eggs and a dead pheasant, but the author refused, leading to their disappearance. The author writes a vivid account of their experience, which is later published in a natural history magazine. The author’s life in Ceylon was filled with love, responsibilities, and a love for animals. However, the author’s father announces the death of their friend Gandhi, causing the author to mourn the loss of his childhood hero.

Chapter 3- In Bombay, the author lived in a suburban house with his mother and sister’s family. He read books in the garden and was told by his father that he would be offered the editorship of his old paper, the Times of India, but would return to Bombay to live with his family. He felt a fawning quality and wanted to return with his father.

Upon arriving in Bombay, his uncle encouraged his children to play with him, which made him feel uneasy. His mother petted him but he did not see her often. He was insulted by his uncle’s behavior and was told to go to bed. After living in Santa Cruz, he lived his own life, with only the children occasionally demanding his presence. The suburb was inhabited by middle-class Christians, and he was hauled to the church every Sunday. His father, Vincent, and other family members were upset and resentful of their situation.

The author’s grandfather who lived in Santa Cruz was a successful engineer. He had a strong Catholic background and was opposed to his father’s marriage due to his mother’s frivolous nature. However, upon arriving in Santa Cruz, the grandfather found it impossible to ignore the author. He invited him to his house where he learned Latin and was taught by his widowed sisters. He was a quick learner and tried to please his grandfather, but he never praised him. After a few trips to the city for treatment, he moved to Bombay to live with his aunt, Aunt Pilly. The family lived in a cool, dark house with books and paintings, and he enjoyed talking to Aunt Pilly about her life. When he asked about his father’s fish, Aunt Pilly showed him the beautiful Midnight Molly, which he was reluctant to keep.

The narrator and his mother catch a Molly, which Aunt Pilly gives him as a gift. The Molly is a bridge between the narrator and Aunt Pilly, and the narrator cherishes it as a bridge to the life he seems to have lost. When they return home, the narrator’s aunt’s children surround them, and they try to investigate the Molly, but it breaks. The narrator finds the Molly, and he sweeps the broken bridge off the path. The narrator develops a habit of loneliness due to the proximity of his aunt, uncle, and cousins. He enjoys looking at his married aunt, Aunt E., who is beautiful and charming. One evening, the narrator is told that Aunt E. will pick up the narrator and uncle from a party. When she arrives, she takes off her sari and wears a utilitarian pink brassiere. The narrator feels a change in himself and the light goes out, leaving him in a tousled darkness.

The narrator is adamant about his father’s arrival at the Bombay airport and his new flat. He is excited to see his father and his uncle, Vincent, and Kutthalingam who are coming to visit with their dogs. The narrator’s mother is hesitant to let him stay at the Ambassador flat, but she agrees. They move into the new flat, which is spacious and has a swimming pool. The narrator is fascinated by the game and the players, but refuses to play. His father takes him to a cricket match, which he finds fascinating. During these early months, he sees little of his mother, who is distant and visits priests and nuns. The narrator’s mother is bitter about the priests and nuns, and she refuses to talk to them.

The narrator’s mother became sadder and paler, and her father tried to take her out. She began to destroy objects and objects, and Vincent, a man she disliked, left. The narrator’s mother spoke for the first time in days, and the narrator remained defiant. Years later, the narrator received letters from Vincent asking for money, which he sent. Vincent died of tuberculosis, and his wife thanked the narrator’s father for the money.

Chapter 4- The author and his parents embarked on a ship to Australia, where his father had never been to Australia. The ship was an organized complex city, with mealtimes and bedtimes in comfortable bunks. The author enjoyed the motion of the ship and the company of other children. The ship became an isolated community, and the author’s mother struggled to meet people. The ship encountered squalls and storms, and the shipwrecked islanders, including the king of the Cocos Islands, were awe-inspiring. The author was disappointed by the people he encountered, and the author found the people to be unreliable. The ship stopped at Perth and Adelaide before disembarking at Melbourne. The author enjoyed Sydney and Canberra, with the cricketer K.S. Duleepsinhji teaching the author how to bowl. The author kept a journal of his trip, producing verses to describe his experiences. The people he met were mostly politicians, such as W.M. Hughes, the First World War premier, Menzies, Chifley, and Evatt.

The author describes his experiences as an Indian expatriate in Australia, where he met a small black man named Charlie, who was from the Jhelum side of India. Charlie had come to Australia as a camel driver and had made a living through casual labor for thirty years. He was the first expatriate he had ever met, and he was introduced to Roger Hartigan, a famous cricketer who had made a hundred runs against England. The author was introduced to Roger in Brisbane, where he would take the author on walks around the city, talking about his cricket career.

In New Zealand, the author experienced a sense of being separate from his body and becoming more abstracted. He wrote more verse and sought solitude, but his mother was less pleased. Duleepsinhji reassured her that the Indian government who wanted him to tour Southeast Asia and prepare a confidential report about press relations in the countries. The author’s mother agreed to go home, despite her initial hysteria.

The author flies from Sydney to Darwin, landing on a barren airstrip with mosquitoes. He head northward, landing at Diakarta and meeting an Indian ambassador. He explores Djakarta, where the author’s mother makes friends with the ambassador’s wife, a neat old lady with silver hair and spectacles. The author’s father interviews Sukarno, and they see the city and the Javanese people. The author’s mother is troubled by the author’s father’s relationship with the ambassador’s wife, who is worried about losing him.

Singapore is hot and filled with rumors of terrorist activity. The author stays in the Raffles Hotel and hears about terrorists on the mainland and Malayan independence. He attends an evening party hosted by a Chinese millionaire friend, where he meets an Indian police officer who shares his knowledge about the terrorists. The police officer congratulates the author’s intelligence and profound knowledge of the situation. The author’s father is congratulated for his son’s intelligence and knowledge of the terrorists.

The author then goes to Saigon to study under the French. Despite his father’s warnings about not to show off, the boy is determined to make a good impression. They visit a café where a bomb was thrown, and a cabaret where a troupe from England performs can-can dances. He is disappointed when the lights go out and a patrol runs into some Viet Minh. After a week in Saigon, they fly to Dalat to interview Bao Dai, the puppet ruler set up by the French. They travel north to Hanoi, where they hear French howitzers and encounter a Vietnamese maidservant who informs them they must drink rice wine. He is excited to join them, but his father insists he stays in Hanoi due to the potential shootings. They arrive at a French post, where they are greeted by a commandant who gives them a bon-bon.

The author recounts his experiences during the Vietnam War, including an interview with a Vietnamese commandant who was a Viet Minh sympathizer. They were taken to a hospital tent where they saw bandaged and worn-looking soldiers. The author’s father questioned why they didn’t stop the man from hitting the man, but Kutty chuckled at the situation. Later, they visited a Vietnamese professor who was a Viet Minh sympathizer and invited them to a garden. Jacqueline, a 15-year-old, was invited to practice her English. The author describes his time in Bangkok, where he visited a restaurant run by a Chinese man who offered them a meal. The author’s father was skeptical but later revealed that he was a writer. They traveled to Rangoon and Calcutta, where they spent six months. When they arrived in Bombay, they found the city lively and the dogs wild.

Chapter 5- In Bombay, the author dreamed of Jacqueline in Hanoi’s garden and wrote verse frequently, but every new attempt was a failure. He discovered an anthology containing work by Eliot, Auden, and Spender, which excited him and allowed him to see how to write verse. He wrote in three different styles, varying in style from Eliot to Spender. He was awed by the soft, husky voices of Anand and Desani, who had published books and met writers who were myths to him.

At a writer’s conference, he met Auden and Spender, who introduced him to the poet. The recognition of one poet by another doubled his output of verse. He also enjoyed cricket, playing it with his friends. The difference between his two lives was marked, as he was the hermit poet at home and the hermit poet at the cricket field. However, he developed a callus on his finger, which he displayed to his father, believing he had cancer. His father examined it and told him not to worry. After studying the entry on cancer in the encyclopedia, he wrote poems about death.

The author writes essays about cricket and is surprised when a publisher friend of the family’s publishes them. Tendulkar, a friend of the author, is a skilled book designer and a lover of Russian literature. He visits Tendulkar’s one-room hovel in Kalbadevi, where he explores the city and its inhabitants. Tendulkar’s love for books and his fascination with the city’s life led the author to develop socialism instincts. The author is taken on expeditions by Kutthalingam, who is astounded by the author’s behavior. Manishi Dey, a painter, introduces the author to modern poets and the work of Sidney Keyes. Verrier, a scholar, introduces the author to contemporary poets and Wordsworth. Verrier encourages the author to learn poetry, and the author’s shyness fades when he praises his works. The author’s frustration with his work drives him on to write more, proving his belief in his talent.

The author describes his experiences with Verrier, a poet who praised him for his verses. He was influenced by Verrier’s letters, which he sent to Bombay, discussing poetry and life. At fifteen, he found Verrier’s letters boring and abandoned. His mother, who had a resentful relationship with him tried to help him recover his lost son’s dog Kumar. However, the author’s cruelty towards her led to a relapse.

A monsoon brought Kumar’s illness, and the author had to take him to the vet. The mother refused to allow Kumar in the flat, fearing it would infect everyone. The author confronted her, but she refused to obey. The author sat on the verandah, protecting the dog and themselves from the rain. The dog eventually died, and the author buried him with Kutthalingam. The author’s mother was too afraid to obey him, and the author’s father was away in Delhi.

The author lived a solitary life outside the flat, playing cricket and drinking coffee. At fifteen, he was too shy to make advances to anyone. The magazine The Illustrated Weekly of India published some of his poems, and the editor, Shaun Mandy, praised the ones he published. Shaun Mandy invited the author to have a drink with him, and he suggested he get together with Nissim Ezekiel, a young poet. Ezekiel encouraged the author to work on his verse and pursue poetry, even though he didn’t consider them a poet. The author’s grandfather died, and the author had no real contact with him for years. He drove down to Santa Cruz for lunch, where he ate English food and enjoyed old Indian Christian life. The author felt no emotion when he heard of his grandfather’s death, which came suddenly through a heart attack.

The narrator is moved by the privacy surrounding his grandfather’s death and the mourners’ condolences. On his sixteenth birthday, he feels maturity and mature, but he still has a lust for girls. His father suggests he study French at the Alliance Française, but he must also pass exams. He falls in love with Colette, a young and pretty blonde woman who acted in plays and had written poetry. He shares private lessons and eventually write a poem called ‘French Lesson’ about her. The poem explains that they didn’t understand each other and he works on it with care and precision. Ezekiel, the poet’s teacher, praises the poem, but it initially cooled his emotions towards Colette and he stops his lessons at the Alliance. The poem reflects the narrator’s desire to be like Rimbaud and his desire to learn French poetry.

The narrator has been deliberately hurting his mother since the death of Kumar, causing her to grow worse. She blames him for sending him abroad and attacks the servants. One day, the narrator hears his mother scream and a violent attack on the servants. The narrator tries to intervene and he catches the knife out of her hand. The narrator’s mother. The narrator calls his father, who tells the terrified servants to leave the flat. The narrator leaves the flat, shaking uncontrollably. A large crowd stares at the windows, and the narrator is left shaking. The father and two doctors reassure him that he is safe, and the narrator is led to the car. The crowd stares in through the windows, leaving the narrator to weep.

The narrator’s father and doctors are trying to convince his mother to open the locked doors, but she refuses. The doctor suggests certifying her insane and breaking down the door, but the father refuses. The family drives to a friend’s flat, where the mother is certified insane and placed in a Bangalore mental home. The father feels guilt for the incident.

Chapter 6-

Tennyson Break, Break, Break as a Victorian Poem

Theme of Loss , Grief and Personal Exposition – Tennyson poems are filled with personal translations of feelings. Many of his poems are written for his deceased friend Arthur Hallam. He was grief stricken after his death and he laments over his death in his poems. The poem is adds the theme of loss and grief stricken where the poet lays near the ”cold gray stones” of his friend tombstone. He is depressed and unable to translate the thoughts flowing inside his head. He observes the life of the Victorian society that is moving as usual and see the fisherman’s child smiling and filled with joy. He laments that he has no companion to share and enjoy like others for he also believe at the same time that he could not enjoy the tender beauty if nature as well when his friend was alive.

Multiple Projection of Life – Tennyson has influenced the Pre-Raphaelites Brotherhood with the writing style of multiple representation of human life. Tennyson uses the imagery of nature to express his feelings and ideas. Nature becomes a mediator for him to express his mind. He beautifully compares the inability to express his sorrow and grief through words with the sea lashing and breaking on the rocks. The analogy suggests that the poet’s thoughts breaks up in the tongue itself before he is able to express his feelings. Critically, one can assess that sea rhymes with me and it suggests perhaps that sea is a symbol for poet’s consciousness that breaks up on the tongue in similitude to the sea that breaks up on the rocks.

Impact of Reform Bills – As a Victorian poem, one can also see the impact of The reform bills that were introduced during those times. The Bills gave equal representation of lowest strata of society and Tennyson also represented the life of the fisherman which are generally not sketched by any other painters or poets in their art. The poem gives some spaces to their representation where the poet sees the fisherman’s children and sailor’s boy are happy and enjoying in the sea. It also gives a vivid life of Victorian society and their daily activities of fisherman who enjoy being at sea and go on usual with their lives.

Representation of Victorian Quest and Journey – The Victorian era was an age of inquiry for new lands and discovery. The poem also give a small space for Victorian quest for journey where the poet sees the usual flow of ships coming from abroad and are proceeding to their harbour below the hill to rest and pack themselves for further voyage. This shows the Victorian spirit of colonial mindset where they go on further voyages into the sea to discover new lands and seek treasures.

Critical Analysis of Francis Bacon Essay Of Studies

Francis Bacon is considered to be the Father of English Essay. He is a man of Renaissance who introduced the spirit of learning and stress on the importance of inculcating knowledge. He said ”Knowledge is power” that reflected the Renaissance thirst for knowledge ans is seen in his propagation through his essays. His essays are mainly aphoristic and lucid. He wrote many essays and has been evaluated by many Neo-Classical poets and other critics as well.

The essay discusses the avail of studying. Its purpose is to persuade one to study and to guide one on how to study if one is to make the best of what one reads meaning a practical application. Bacon highlights that studies comes best from experience but the knowledge becomes vague if it is of no use in practical supply. In this essay , Bacon states that of education and earning a knowledge. He aphoristically articulated that, “studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability.

Bacon felt that some people gain knowledge for pure delight. People, who acquire knowledge for delight, do so because they enjoy it. For instance, those who play sports practice and learn about their sport because they want to, not because they have to. There are, however, some people who gain knowledge for mere ornament. These people only want to improve themselves in the eyes of others. These are the people who try to better themselves by bragging about their achievements and accomplishments in conversation with others.

There are those who gain knowledge for ability. They want to show that they are able to do something. They learn for themselves in their free time. Ability is widely used in the area of business, those who are well educated rather than those who are not better run a company.

Bacon strives to persuade us to study, and tells us how to study if one is able to make the best of what they read. He does this by using many rhetorical devices and substantiations to prove his arguments. Bacon attempts to prove to us that “studies serve for delight, for ornament and for discourse” by showing us how education is used and can be used in our lives.

Education is meant to be preparation for the real world. Bacon encourages studies, he warns that studying heavily can lead to laziness and being idle. If one uses one’s knowledge too often in a conversation with others, then one is bragging himself and to be guided solely by one’s studies one becomes a scholar rather than a practical man. According to Bacon, dishonest men condemn education; stupid men admire education; but wise men use education as their real world experience dictates.

Bacon returns to addressing the effects of reading, conversation, and writing: reading creates a well-rounded man; conversation makes a man think quickly; and writing, by which Bacon usually means argument essay writing, makes a man capable of thinking with logic and reason. History, Bacon argues, makes men wise; poetry, clever; mathematics, intellectually sharp; logic and rhetoric, skilled in argument.

The essay is a clear reflection on Renaissance humanism. Bacon’s essay reflects humanistic values such as the spirit of acquiring knowledge, human values on friendship, love, marriage and others. The essay “Of Studies” also highlights Renaissance humanism that focuses on the spirit on learning and acquiring knowledge through studying in a proper manner. He believes in practical application of knowledge that one acquires establishing the Renaissance humanism that values knowledge and practical sensibility. The another element of humanism in the essay is the character development of an individual through reading and acquiring knowledge. He distinguishes people who uses their knowledge to brag to others and there are some who uses it for their real world experiences.

Summary of Francis Bacon Of Simulation and Dissimulation

Browning Andrea del Sarto as a Dramatic Monologue

Andrea del Sarto , written by Robert Browning is a dramatic monologue based on the life of an Italian painter Andrea d’Agnolo. He was a contemporary of Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci. He was given some amount of money by the king to buy some Italian paintings which he never did instead build a house and satisfied his wife’s desires and needs. Apart from the such psychological musings of human conflicts, Browning also drives attention to his love poem Meeting at Night

The poem recounts and recalls back the actions of the painter and the subtitle The Faultless Painter is given to him because he was a man who was perfect in technical painting. The poem gives a discourse on his life as well as his realization of betrayal and coming to terms with life. Browning has given a touch of Victorian attitude along with the idea of art for life’s  sake where art has a moral purpose. It is clearly projected in the poem where the painter comes back to his moral sense on art and life as whole. 

The dramatic monologue always opens up with an intensified action. The action in the poem holds a different perspective on reality and opens with a message on psychological distress of the painter as well as the action itself. It seems that the painter and his wife Lucrezia had been fighting for a long time and the painter demands her to come closer to him. This scene shows the intensity of action where the couples are quarrelling and Andrea trying to convince his wife to be intimate towards him. It also throws light metaphorically on other reality where it shows the inner turmoil that the painter itself is quarrelling within himself. 

The writing aspect of dramatic monologue is the conscious flow of time. In the poem , Andrea focuses on his own life and goes back to the time of past where he recounts his mistakes and the things he did especially the money that was given to him by the King which he used it to build a house in Fiesole and to satisfy his wife’s  needs. He comes to terms about his life where he now realises that though he is a faultless painter yet there is something lacking in his painting and that is rooted due to his inner soul that is dishonest. This epiphanic moment is beautifully expressed in the poem where he looks outside the window and sees the beauty of Fiesole where he hears the last bells of the church, feels the chill autumn in the wind . He could see in this images the death and decay of his creativity being included in his “twilight piece “. 

The another feature of a dramatic monologue is inner conflict of the character. Andrea exhibited inner conflict of guilt and realization. He is in a state of inner conflict within himself where he feels guilty for his past and has now comes to terms with his mistakes to refresh his inner dishonesty. He has now realised his mistakes and guilty and it flows throughout the poem. One of the important scene that is depicted in the poem is his painting being compared to his contemporaries of Raphael and Michelangelo where he believed that their paintings were admired as it inspired from the inner soul. Though his painting had marked great in the public eye yet he was unable to project the inner soul like his contemporary in his art. He was called a faultless painter yet he realises now that his painting is perfect in technicality but lacks the inner soul and could not grasp it. 

However , the dramatic monologue also helps in the characterization of the character. Andrea del Sarto was a great painter and even acquired a name The Faultless Painter. One can observe that he was a dishonest man because he betrayed the King and used up the money for his benefit and gain. He had chose money over the masterpieces of art and hence it gives justice to the reason pertaining to the lack of inner soul in his work or art. Since his inner soul is dishonest and corrupt as well as materialistic, it affected his painting. One can also observe that Browning had used a Victorian notion of materialistic mindset where Andrea also possessed the same Victorian attitude of being materialistic. One can also assess the character of Andrea that he is a man who has failed both in art and life as well. Many artists uses art to earn their livelihood but he used the money to build a house and for materialistic terms. Hence , his betrayal to the King Francis led to his betrayal to art that is reflected upon in the decay of his creativity due to his dishonest soul. He was also a failure in life as his wife committed infidelity and fallen for a cousin where he could not get in terms with his cheating wife as well. Hence , he may enjoy being called as the faultless painter yet his life is completely in shambles. 

Furthermore , Browning was a Victorian poet and the dramatic monologue propagates art for life’s  sake in the poem. It is seen where the poem gives a sense of morality and a purpose is served through art itself. Andrea , who is a painter realizes his own mistake and guilt that reshapes back his life reflecting the ideology of art for life’s sake. It is used to teach the society to regain the consciousness of religion and moral values in the society. The poem projects how materialism can divert the person from morality and spiritual path and is seen in the character of Andrea who got diverted in his life as well. Hence we can say that Browning also propagated the idea of art for life’s sake.

Critical Analysis of Addison Sir Roger at Church

The essay Sir Roger at Church (1711) was written by Joseph Addison and appeared in the periodical essay of The Spectator. The main motive of Addison and Steele was to educate the society especially the middle class society. Their essays deals with morality views and opposes the two influencing cultures of that time. They both wanted to restrain the people from the influences of Restoration cultures that were filled with licentiousness and vulgarity as well as the political culture between Tories and Whigs. It was Steele who initiated the fictional character named Sir Roger de Coverely in the essays but Addison refined the character soon reached the  maturity of the character writing. 

The essay Sir Roger at Church deals with Sir Roger musings on Church and the seventh day of Sunday. The author has given an opinion about the Sunday that it is a blessing for mankind to relax and initiate a good communion with the Supreme Being. He tries to reform the society through moral education and brings forth the significance of Sunday and it’s impact on human civilization. The essay also talks about Sir Roger and sketches his way of life who came to the village to guide mankind to the path of morality. 

Critically , the essay stresses on moral education. The author has highlighted that morality only comes through Sundays where Sundays is a human institution established to promote human civilization and the inexistence of Sundays would led to the degeneration of civility. This is seen where the villagers would have turned into barbarians and savages. The morality is provoked where Sundays prevent the villagers from turning into savages meaning the Sundays provide moral education and relieves human burdens from the weekdays stress and dirt. It teaches and guide mankind through the priest where they assign duties and responsibilities that each individual should do to civilize themselves. It is on Sundays man and woman dresses neatly and clean as well as behaves in a good manner so that they return back home refresh and anew. Sir Roger is presented as a man of moral educator who came to the village to Spread moral education. He states that when he came to the village , many people were irregular to the Church and hence he decides to give them some hassock , prayer book and even chose a Church Choirs for the congregation. This depiction clearly reflects the stress on morality. 

The essay actually shows the reformation of society. It reforms the society from Restoration influences. The manners of society was degraded during those times and the influence of Restoration lifestyle seems to have an impact on the behaviour of the people. The essay gives a Stoic notion where the priests assigns the moral responsibility and duty of spirituality in the mannerisms and behaviour of the people. It is trying to civilize the uncultured society where the spiritual duties would help civilize the uncivilize society of Restoration influences. The essay also indirectly opposes the Restoration influences of male vulgarity where man approaches woman in their stoop standards. The author shows that man would approach woman during Sunday’s in their behaviour that clearly opposes the Restoration way of approaching a woman that involves vulgarity and immorality. The stress on Sunday’s  significant opposes Restoration way of lifestyle where the civility of Sunday makes a person a better human being and Addison is indirectly opposing Restoration attitude towards carefree way of life. The Restoration influence is seen when the villagers were irregular to the Church and the idea of carefree way of life is criticized when Sir Roger made the villagers to go to Church , kneel before God and gave them hassock , prayer book and chose choirs for the singing. 

The Reformation of the society was based on human behaviour. Human behaviour is something that Addison tried to reform in the society. It seems that behaviour and actions were degraded in the society and has become immoral. Many Restoration lifestyle was filled with immoral behaviours and actions and Addison tried to reform that. It is seen in the essay where Sir Roger tried to look after the villagers actions in the church. The author was surprised one day to see Sir Roger confronting a man named Johan Matthews who was disturbing others in the Church and Sir Roger tells him not to. It is also seen in the essay where Addison attacks materialism of the society. The Restoration lifestyle was all about material power and fortune hunters where money have the dominant authority and power. The essay tries to dissolute the authority of power and instead give power to human relationships and bonds. It is seen when the bad relationships between Priests and landlords are depicted. These two are wealthy people and priests preaches Marxist ideals to go against landlords while the landlord turn people into atheist. These two people are wealthy enough to influence the people and hence the author gives insight into bond and good relationships among wealthy people to direct people into the good path. This indirectly opposes the Restoration way of life where the wealthy people uses money as their authority to hold power and position and also influences people in their lives. 

The essay also indirectly opposes the political situation of the time. It gives the realism of the age where the society was degraded due to the ongoing political situation. However , the essay do not even invoke any political matters and perhaps Addison is trying to tell the society that political matters are superficial and the important matters are human civilization and progression. This human civilization and progression can only begun through moral education and cleansing away the dirt from weekdays on Sundays. The clear indication of the stress on moral responsibilities and accountability to human civilization gives opposition to political situation of that time. 

The essay develops a character writing meaning the development of character sketch of Sir Roger. He is a man of gentleman and his characterization clearly opposes the Restoration depiction of man who were involved in many illicit affairs and even incestuous relationships. Sir Roger completely opposes Restoration way of life and his characterization has been delineated as the leader of Church congregation who looks after the villagers. Critically , Sir Roger watches the movement and behaviour of the villagers and looks at the villagers if they are singing in the church or sleeping in the church or if anyone is missing in the church. This shows that he is a man of practical sensibility and a man who is devoted to Church and moral education.

Sir Roger in the essay can be seen as a man who uses money for the benefit of others. It is seen where he increase the amount of priest every year to five pounds so that the younger generation can take interests in becoming a priest. He is a social reformer who came to the village as a model to show the life of morality. He showed the relationships between him and the Chapman. The relationship between the Squire and Chapman was dangerous and filled with threats and violence. Sir Roger showed a path of human relationships and the bonding among villagers that would help to enhance civility in the society.

Summary of Sir Roger at Westminster Abbey

Agatha Christie The Murder of Roger Ackroyd as a Detective Novel

The Murder of Roger Ackryod (1926) , written by Agatha Christie is a detective fiction first published in UK by William Collins in June 1926 and US by Dodd on 19th June. It is also considered to be a controversial novel as well. It is set in the fictional village of King’s Abbot in England narrated by Dr. James Sheppard who becomes “Pairot’s Assistant”. 

The novel is weaved beautifully with the introduction of the murderer himself. It is quite conventional for any detective fiction to start with a murderer itself. The murderer of Roger Ackroyd was Dr. Sheppard himself who ironically is also the narrator of the story. The case was resolved by the detective Hercule Pairot who is a renowned detective and has been used in many of Christie’s novels. 

As a detective fiction , it has a lot to do with criminality and their participation to hide their secrets. Many detective fiction reveals the true nature of criminals who try to hide their inner realities but is exposed later in the novel. Dr. Sheppard s motive was to save himself from financial strain due to his investments and started to blackmail Mrs. Ferrars. Critically , the novel can also be seen as a social critique on materialism. Christie may have used a genre of detective novel but she is criticizing the material power that is engulfing the mind of the individual during that time and the path one can undergo to extract money from their own friends and family members. This situation is seen in the novel where Dr.Sheppard was involved with the murder of Roger Ackroyd who was in a financial strain and he wanted to overcome the financial crisi by killing him. This shows the dark side of realities of human life associated with being materialistic. 

In addition to this , the detective fiction shows the characteristics of detectives who unfolds the stories and catches the murder. The detective is Hercule Patriot who with the help of Dr.Sheppard tries to solve the murder of Roger Ackroyd. Patriot was a smart detective who dig out many clues and especially played with the psychology of the criminals. He was good in the game of psychology that he was able to hint other characters hiding their secrets. It was Cecil Ackroyd and Raymond who came forward to expose their secrets. There were many suspicions to the case of Roger Ackroyd’s murder where Kent was accused including Parker. It is later revealed that Flora lied about communicating with Ackroyd before the night of the murder. After looking at the facts and assumptions, Hercule Patriot was able to determine the murderer as Dr. Sheppard because Patriot was able to prove that other characters are left with the suspicions but revealed the reasons that they are not the murderer. The family members who were in financial debts were of a great suspicion but it is later understood that they were not but simply thetiming and incidents that provoked their innocence. 

Patriot clarified all the characters innocence including Charles Kent , Parker and other family members as well as friends of Roger Ackroyd who were involved with the murder of Roger Ackroyd. Throughout the investigation, it is revealed that these characters were only hiding their inner secrets that has no relevance to the murder. It is then revealed that the night when Raymond and Blunt heard Ackroyd talking to someone else was just a misunderstanding. It was a dictaphone that he bought a week before. Sheppard had already stabbed him back while he was returning home and put him in his study room locked the room and planted the shoes of Ralph Paton to make him look like a murderer. It was full plan and a plot at the beginning to make others look like a murderer and eliminate the true murderer. Critically , one can see the mindset of a criminal that the criminal tries to remove any evidence that relates to them and tries to provide alibi for himself and brings innocent lives to put into suspicion.

Arthur Conan Doyle The Hound of Baskervilles as a Detective Novel

Agatha Christie Murder on the Orient Express as a Detective Novel

Walcott Dream on Monkey Mountain as a Post-Colonial Play

Binary Oppositions– The binary opposition is one of the important element of postcolonialism. The play gives insights into the post-colonial world where the white colonizer is still considered to be of superior race and the African race to be inferior. The binary opposition of superior/inferior and white/black exists in the play. The moment Lestrade calls Makak and other prisoners as “animals” establishes the superiority of Whites and stereotypes and demeans the existence of Africans to be inferior as well as savages , animals and inhuman. Said in his Orientalism has talk about this binary oppositions where the West creates a knowledge about the East by stereotyping them as “sensual” , “savages” and “barbaric”. This is clearly reflected in the play where Makak and other prisoners are considered to be inhuman and treated as criminals. The name of Makak itself refers to a monkey which many colonial settlers gives a “zoological names” to the colonized people to establish their superiority which also reflects the binary oppositions at play. The idea of stereotyping a black identity to apes is a other aspect of binary opposition as well as racism which many black communities still face today in the post-colonial world. The character Lestrade tells about black identity to be of origin from apes which is associated with Darwin’s theory and he uses it to subjugate the colonized people while establishing the civility of white colonizers. 

Hybridity – The play also shows hybridity of characters. The main character Makak is of hybrid origin. The hybridity is seen in the character of Makak where he believes himself of having the whiteness in him to establish his superiority and reduce the inferiority complex. It is also seen in the character of Lestrade as well. The play contains hybridity of Western literatures as well where Golding’s Lord of the Flies scene is established that reshapes a sense of lost identity to Lestrade. When he encountered Basil , it was an epiphany for him to regain his true identity which is similitude to Simon’s encountering a Beelzebub. However ,  Lestrade also showed the same rousing emotions like Milton’s Samson from Samson Agnosites after finding himself. Lestrade confesses his mistake and he bowed down to the mother earth of Africa and accepts his true identity. The another western literature that muses in the play is Jean Rhys The Wilde Sargasso Sea where the main protagonist realizes her name is not Bertha but Antoinette Cosway which is similar to Makak realising his own true name as Felix Hobain. This reflects the sense of hybridity in the play from a writing style where Walcott who himself was of hybrid origin embraces both western and African style in his writing. 

Identity Crisis – The Post-Colonial world is filled with identity crisis. In the opening of the play , when Corporal Lestrade asked Makak’s race , he replied to him that he was tired of answering that question. This reflects the long colonial subjugation associated with identity. It reflects the identity crisis of Makak. The inferiority complex resides among the colonized settlers because of such representation and subjugation of their identity. Many characters including Makak does not even remember his own real name as he lives in an illusion of the fabricated world constructed by the colonizers for him. This led to inferiority complex in him as he feels subjugated due to his colour and race. This blackness is the metaphor for the identity that is devoid for Makak. It is seen where he has not seen his own self in the mirror and water but has only seen himself from the lens of the colonizers meaning that Makak is living in a world of illusion constructed by the colonizers making him feel inferior about his race and identity. It is also seen Makak also longs for whiteness to establish a sense of authority in the play. It is depicted where he saw a white woman who claims to be a lineage of lions and kings and Corporal Lestrade believes that this illusion is a crazy drive towards whiteness. This reflects the identity crisis in the play where it arises out of colonial subjugation against their identity for a long time and has a serious impact on the mental health making them feel inferior about their race and colour. 

Mimicry – The another aspect of postcolonialism is mimicry. The post-colonial world also saw many natives who shared an ambivalent relationship with colonizer and colonized. Corporal Lestrade is a mimic man who mimicks the self and identity of the white colonizers. He shares an ambivalent relationship with his own race and white supremacy. He adopted the self of the white colonizers and decides to oppress his own kin by calling them as animals and treated them as sub human beings which is clearly a mimicry of white colonizers. He states that his white man helps him to do that work for him. It means that Lestrade is following what Fanon said about black skin and white masks which he carries in his personality. He has an appearance of a black identity but he wears the masks of a white supremacy to subjugate his own kin and to establish a sense of superior complexity. He adopts the mimicry of white colonizers to reduce his inferior complexity due to the establish knowledge about the black identity and could not break the illusion of it. Hence , he mimics it to mitigate his identity crisis and inferior complexity. 

Quest for Home – The idea of home is a mythical and imaginative place for many diasporic writers. The home has become an imaginary place for them as it only resides as a memory but an incomplete memory. Walcott is trying to locate his own home and sense of belonging in the play. The character Makak and Corporal Lestrade is actually in the search and quest for their true identity and a place called home. At the end of the play , Makak realizes his own name as Felix Hobain and Lestrade accepts his black entity and they all goes back to Monkey Mountain which is their true origin. The Monkey Mountain could symbolises the place of Africa. 

Decolonization – The idea of decolonization is important in the play where the play seems to follow Ngugi Wa Thiongo Decolonising the Mind. Walcott seems to decolonize his own mind to share the colonized experiences from the white colonizers. He tries to break the illusion or dream of Makak who was an animal but starts to come back to reality and foregrounds his own name and his true identity. He was able to accept his own blackness and identity at the end of the play that reflects the decolonization process of the mind. It is also reflected in the character of Lestrade who accepts his own blackness and his own identity and he took off his own white masks to embrace his true origin and goes back to Monkey Mountain implying the decolonization of mind. 

Click Here to know Critical Analysis of Mahmoud Darwish I Came from There Poemhttps://getsetnotes.com/critical-analysis-of-mahmoud-darwish-i-came-from-there/

Smollet The Adventures of Peregrine Pickle as a Picaresque Novel

Tobias Smollet is an important literary figure and considered to be one of the four wheels of English Novel. He is known for his novels and his contributions are immense in the field of literature. The Adventures of Peregrine Pickle (1751) is a picaresque novel where the protagonist goes into a journey of self -development. The plot moves in a sequence but is interrupted with another story that also showcases the same pattern of picaresque traits. 

The important element of a picaresque novel is the protagonist who is dishonest and an anti hero in the novel. Peregrine Pickle is unlikable and he is disliked by his own mother and brother. He is someone who is brought up in a low class society and he is self centred and rebellious character who does not conform to the traditional means of the society. These traits in the characterization of Peregrine Pickle makes him the anti hero who is dishonest and seeks fortune for carefree life as seen in many of the literary novels being produced during his time. 

Smollett also has shown the same plot treatment as his contemporary writers such as Defoe and Fielding. Defoe’s characterization of protagonists goes into misfortunes and fortunes in a picaresque novel such as Moll Flanders whereas Fielding’s protagonists are orphaned and abandoned by their family as seen in Tom Jones. Smollet has shown such plot treatment of Defoe and Fielding in his novel where Peregrine Pickle is a dishonest , carefree man who is alienated and adopted by his uncle Commodore Hawser Trunnion which is similar to Fielding’s Tom Jones. It is also interesting to note that Peregrine Pickle found himself indulging in superficial life and seeking fortune which is similar to Defoe’s Moll Flanders. 

As Tom Jones appeared to be violent and ended up wounding Mrs. Waters husband in the novel, one can also find Peregrine Pickle and his friends stealing a peasant’s fruit and ended up beating the man to death. It reflects the type of character that picaresque novels project where the protagonist is an anti hero for their behaviour but he is the main character of the novel who is dishonest and he appears to be a dangerous person at the same time.

Critically , the picaresque novels showcases protagonist fortunes and misfortunes during their odysseys of adventure in the society. Peregrine Pickle got engaged to superficial life of pranks during his stay with his uncle. After leaving his uncle’s house , he got into more misfortune in Europe where he played pranks , chased after women in the Grand Tour reflecting a sense of engagement towards superficiality which is seen overall in many picaresque novels. 

However , his fortune’s is shaped when he returned to England as a con man deceiving the high class wealthy man into reading their fortune with the help of a fake magician. He becomes wealthy and he eventually falls in love with Emilia who returned his feelings for him. The misfortune again bestow upon him which is another trait of picaresque novels where he loses his fortune’s and he fell into a debt leading him into Fleet Debtors prison. Many picaresque novel protagonists had been sent into prison including Tom Jones and Moll Flanders. However , the shift of misfortune into fortune is shaped again after they are released from the prison. Peregrine inherits 80,000 pounds and he is able to pay off his debts and he married Emilia. 

 It is also interesting to note the psychological development of self in the protagonist which is abundant in many picaresque novels. The protagonist learned and progressed in their life learning about the society and the negative choices that impacted their life. It is in this stage of experiences, the character development of Peregrine Pickle is escalated to a moral responsibility while learning a valuable lesson during his stay in prison and he repents for his behaviour to live in an antisocial manner.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)