Introduction
The poem is divided into four parts. The poem reflects the socio-political upheavals of Manipur state in Northeast India. It explores the odyssey of a poet’s identity, self, history of the state and its indigenous tribe. It is a post-colonial poem that addresses many issues of the post-colonial giving a sense of poet’s ambivalent relationship with his native soil. The theme of the poem addresses many cultural issues, violence, war, and corruption of the society which has post-colonial implications.
Part I Summary
The poem begins with the poet suggesting a sense of self-reflection and introspection. The speaker acknowledges that he cannot claim to be in complete control of his own life (“Not once can I say I am the captain behind this wheel of fire“). He expresses a feeling of loss or displacement, symbolized by misplacing a bronze bell and leaving behind untended hearths. The speaker realizes that something has changed within him, possibly due to his experiences or the passage of time. It’s a contemplative moment that explores the complexities of personal growth and transformation.
Then the speaker highlights a sense of identity transformation and his connection with nature. The speaker expresses his ability to define himself (“I can say I am this or that“) and his admiration for the steadfastness and character of water and stone. He reflects on his past, mentioning being made a sheep as a boy, but now feeling enchanted into a goat. The townspeople seem to enjoy parading the speaker with a marigold garland between their horns.
The speaker speaks of the journey to Bohemia, a metaphorical kingdom of Art, where he sought inspiration and creativity. He expresses a sense of curiosity and fascination with the behind-the-scenes world of theater, mentioning painted girls and poor blind boys who come to perform. However, the speaker also mentions mixing his drinks with despair in the evenings, implying a sense of disillusionment or sadness. He attributes his lack of productivity to love, suggesting that romantic experiences have affected his creative pursuits.
The speaker then describe the story of his community or people who have sown suspicion and hatred among themselves. As a result, their crops have been destroyed and they now find themselves begging from their neighboring communities, while also pointing fingers at each other. The constant bickering and backbiting among them has silenced any sense of compassion. The speaker expresses a clear intention to erase all traces of their violent history by resorting to destructive measures like slashing and burning. The poet is clearly indicating at the post-colonial ethnic rivalry and conflicts that exist in Manipur state.
The speaker then talks of a complex and a conflicted history. The speaker reflects on a past where he met and clashed with others, going their separate ways while still holding onto the belief that their own history is untainted, despite the violence and enslavement they have caused. The mention of rewriting history with malicious intent highlights the danger of distorting the truth. Memory is portrayed as fragile, easily ignited and explosive. The mention of boys returning to Christmas with hate and fear implies a twisted celebration, as they take a roundabout path to outsmart an enemy who would take pleasure in the birth of a merciful son. The dreams of these boys, when they finally return home, are portrayed as filled with red, potentially symbolizing violence or conflict. The last lines of the poem suggest a dark and troubled history, where the impact of hatred and fear is deeply ingrained. It reflects the psychological effects of communal violence that has spurred hatred and resentment amongst the people.
Part II Summary
The initial part of the second emphasizes a sense of intimacy and vulnerability in a relationship. Here, Manipur is personified as a beloved. The speaker describes touching his partner’s healing breasts with hands filled with love. However, the mention of scars on the partner’s body suggests a history of mistreatment or abuse. The speaker questions who is responsible for branding their love with pain and using his partner like a toy doll. The mention of guilt implies that the speaker feels complicit or responsible for the harm inflicted upon his partner. The personification gives an ecofeminist element in the poem where the state of Manipur is compared to a woman who has been oppressed with gun violence and war (associated largely with patriarchal men).
There are a poignant and the heartbreaking portrayal of the speaker’s return to his war-torn country. With a heavy heart, the speaker turns towards his flaming country, only to hear the hills scream the name of his beloved. The mention of soldiers with black scarves turning into shrouds implies the presence of death and destruction. The trucks carrying death and devastation, along with the eager rescuer in his armored car, symbolize the ongoing violence and conflict. The graves of youths who died in turmoil serve as solemn reminders of the toll of war, acting as the only milestones on the path to the city. The part conveys the devastating impact of war on both the physical landscape and the lives of its inhabitants.
There are also a contrast between the natural beauty of the hills and the harsh reality of the speaker’s surroundings. Instead of the musk of his beloved, the speaker inhales the acrid smoke of explosives and funeral pyres. Mammon, a personification of greed, arrives to inspect the city and further devastates it by cutting down the remaining trees. The mention of morning papers selling the same bland items, such as rape, extortion, ambushes, and embezzlement, highlights the prevalence of crime and corruption in society.
Then the speaker addresses about a pervasive atmosphere of fear and oppression. There is talk on the streets, in dark corners, and in homes, with words whispered and caught by the ears of a restaurant. The people honor the unvarying certainty and pay routine homage to silence, suggesting a climate of conformity and suppression of dissent. The enemy of the people is described as someone who wears a new face each morning, indicating a sense of constant surveillance and uncertainty. The mention of freedom prompts introspection, questioning whether one is truly free in a society that feels sullen and oppressive day after day.
Part III Summary
The beginning part indicates a bleak and oppressive society where values and virtues are distorted. Uprightness is not shown in public displays of affection, integrity is not upheld in abstaining from drinking, and worthiness is twisted into supporting a new faith that promotes violence. Service to the state is corrupted into exploiting it for personal gain, and even when that is no longer possible, people turn to stealing from each other. Chastity is enforced by controlling women’s clothing, and purity is equated with refraining from expressing love. The uncertainty of basic necessities like oil, lentils, potatoes, food for babies, and transportation reflects the instability and insecurity of the outside world. The part highlights the oppressive nature of the society depicted in the poem, where values are perverted and nothing can be taken for granted.
Then the speaker suggest a distorted and contradictory notion of patriotism. Fire, water, and air, which are essential elements of life, are now being treated as commodities. Patriotism is portrayed as preaching secession and mourning the merging with another nation, reflecting a sense of confusion and conflicting loyalties. It is also associated with preserving native customs and traditions, but at the same time, imposing them on other people. This concept of imposing one’s cultural norms and values onto others gives a post-colonial space in the poem of internal colonialism. Admiring youth who engage with violence and proclaiming brotherhood while secretly depriving others indicate hypocrisy and double standards. The mention of playing the music of guns to an unborn child symbolizes the normalization of violence.
The speaker highlights the power and significance of history. The mention of “stones and hills speaking when we fall silent” suggests that history has a voice and a presence that continues to resonate even when a person is absent from here. The poet questions why one have such complex and conflicting emotions towards history – why one fears it, love it, hate it, lie about it, and conceal aspects of it giving a post-colonial impression of an individuals ambivalent relationship with one’s historical identities. Despite these conflicting feelings, one still feel compelled to enact history in the “coarse theatre of time,” suggesting that history holds a significant role in shaping one’s lives and society.
Part IV Summary
The last part opens with an expression of a sense of solitude and reflection. The speaker acknowledges the influence of a man who may have been independent and self-sufficient, without the need for a woman. The mention of a “tiny land bound by fire” could refer to a place that is geographically constrained or surrounded by danger. The phrase “slave to an unexamined life” suggests that the speaker feels trapped or constrained by a life that hasn’t been fully explored or understood. The following lines convey a sense of remorse or regret, as the speaker reflects on past experiences of love, fear, anger, and despair. The imagery of the penitent wearing sackcloth and the sky’s dress in shreds adds to the somber tone, suggesting a state of mourning or loss.
Then there is a sense of loneliness and disconnection. The comparison of stars holding up the sky like nuts and bolts suggests that there is a need for stability and support in the world. However, the speaker expresses a feeling of people not allowing each other to dream or connect emotionally. The mention of love being a forgotten word implies a lack of love or an absence of meaningful connections. The lines also touch upon the ability to both suffer and inflict hurt on the person one loves the most, suggesting a complex and potentially painful dynamic in relationships.
The speaker then expresses a sense of loss, despair, and weariness. The mention of the festival of lights during childhood implies a joyful and vibrant time in the past. However, the speaker is now with widows who are unable to light lamps, symbolizing a loss of hope and light. The idea that the land is tired and exhausted, possibly from the violence and bloodshed it has witnessed, reflects a somber tone. The mention of the lack of peace between the farmer and his fields suggests a strained relationship with nature and the struggles of agricultural life. The line about all men being tired of being men hints at a broader disillusionment or weariness with the human condition. It also highlights the predicament of men suffering internally to embrace masculinity while getting exhausted of protecting their people from external menaces. Finally, the acknowledgment of death implies a recognition of mortality and the fragility of life.
Lastly, the speaker describes a complex and challenging situation. The speaker expresses a desire to explain abominable laws, likely referring to oppressive or unjust laws. The mention of leaving a life without mirrors suggests a desire to escape self-reflection and the judgments of society. The blue ode between pines and the winter sky evokes a sense of natural beauty and tranquility. However, the speaker ponders where he can run from his homeland and flee from the love of his partner (Manipur). The mention of pursuing prisons and criminal words implies a sense of being trapped or constrained by societal expectations or restrictions.
Robin Ngangom Native Land Summary
Critical Analysis of Emily Dickinson Success is Counted Sweetest
Eunice de Souza De Souza Prabhu Summary