Edward Albee The Zoo Story as an Absurd Play

Edward Albee’s “The Zoo Story” (1958) is often considered an example of Theatre of the Absurd, a theatrical movement that emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. Absurdist plays are characterized by their exploration of existential themes, illogical or nonsensical situations, and unconventional dialogue. “The Zoo Story” exhibits many of these characteristics, making it a compelling example of an absurd play.

  1. Existential themes: One of the key aspects of Theatre of the Absurd is its focus on existentialism, which examines questions about the meaning and purpose of human existence. In “The Zoo Story,” the two main characters, Peter and Jerry, struggle with these themes. Peter, a seemingly well-adjusted, middle-class man, is confronted by Jerry, a social outcast, who challenges Peter’s complacency and comfortable life. Throughout the play, the characters grapple with their own sense of purpose, identity, and the meaning of their lives.
  2. Illogical and nonsensical situations: Absurdist plays often feature events and situations that defy logic and reason, highlighting the chaotic and unpredictable nature of existence. In “The Zoo Story,” Jerry’s seemingly random encounter with Peter in Central Park leads to a bizarre and unpredictable series of events. Jerry’s anecdotes about his landlady’s dog and his visit to the zoo, while strange and disconnected from reality, serve to create an atmosphere of absurdity.
  3. Unconventional dialogue: Absurdist plays often use language in inventive and unconventional ways, with characters engaging in long, seemingly meaningless monologues or non-sequiturs. “The Zoo Story” is no exception, as Jerry’s lengthy, disjointed speech about his life and experiences challenges traditional notions of narrative and conversation. It can be difficult for audiences to discern the meaning or purpose behind Jerry’s words, which adds to the overall sense of absurdity.
  4. Alienation and isolation: Absurdist plays often emphasize the sense of alienation and isolation experienced by the characters. In “The Zoo Story,” both Peter and Jerry are isolated in their own ways. Peter, while appearing to be content with his life, seems disconnected from any genuine sense of personal fulfillment. Jerry, on the other hand, is a social outcast who is unable to form meaningful relationships with others. This theme of isolation is further highlighted by the setting, as the entire play takes place on a park bench, separating the characters from the rest of society.
  5. Lack of resolution: Finally, Theatre of the Absurd often resists providing clear resolutions or answers to the questions and situations presented in the play. “The Zoo Story” ends abruptly, with Jerry’s death after he impales himself on a knife Peter is holding. This shocking conclusion leaves audiences with more questions than answers, further contributing to the play’s sense of absurdity.

In summary, Edward Albee’s “The Zoo Story” can be considered an absurd play due to its exploration of existential themes, illogical situations, unconventional dialogue, themes of alienation and isolation, and lack of resolution. These elements work together to challenge traditional theatrical conventions and create a sense of disorientation and confusion for the audience, which is characteristic of Theatre of the Absurd.

Please follow and like us:

One Reply to “Edward Albee The Zoo Story as an Absurd Play”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)